Cross-Device Reliability
Catch cross-platform
failures before
users do.
A product can feel stable on one device and quietly fail on another. Web, mobile web, APK, and IPA each bring different layouts, inputs, and edge cases. QA closes that gap before deployment and through the changes that follow.
Different environments. One quality standard.
Flexible Scope
Lean for fast validation. Scaled for complex changes.
The scope is defined by your product and risk profile - not by fixed packages or predefined limits. You get the exact level of QA your product needs - without overengineering or unnecessary overhead.
Single or multi-platform. Manual, automated, or hybrid - aligned to your needs before execution starts.
Delivery Flow
A clean QA path founders can read in one glance.
Scope
A brief conversation to define success criteria and edge cases.
Test
Design and execute testing techniques as per the defined scope and needs.
Report
Prepare documentation for all findings and recommendations.
Verify
Retest fixes against the agreed scope and success criteria, documenting remaining risks.
Release summary
Verified fixes and remaining risks documented for your release decision.
Your QA engineer
Mykola M — manual and automation QA
I test web and mobile products with a scope shaped around product risks. My portfolio documents QA experience, an ISTQB CTFL certificate, and training in WebdriverIO web and mobile automation.
Hiring for QA? Review my experience and contact me about freelance, contract, or full time collaboration.
Discuss a QA roleQA questions, answered
Coverage, deliverables, and the next step.
Which platforms can be included?
Web and mobile web, Android applications (APK), and iOS applications (IPA). Devices, browsers, and environments are agreed for the cycle based on your product and risk profile.
What do I receive after testing?
Documentation of findings, defects, and recommendations, followed by verification of fixes within the agreed scope. Success criteria and edge cases are defined at the start of the cycle.
What access is needed to begin?
Access requirements are defined during the scope review for your product, platforms, and environment. Start with a brief description of the changes; the testing setup is agreed before execution begins.
How are fixes verified?
Fixes are retested against the agreed scope and success criteria. A summary of verified changes and remaining risks informs your release decision.
How are scope and price agreed?
A short review establishes product risks, requested coverage, scope, and quote. The amounts below are starting examples. Manual, automated, or hybrid testing is aligned with your needs before execution starts.
Example starting scopes
Quick
USD 99–499 From USD 75
Fast start with prioritized risks and a clear next-step plan. Manual execution.
Estimated effort 2-7 hours
Standard
USD 499–1,499 From USD 375
Core flows, structured regression, and clear go/no-go. Standard automation.
Estimated effort 7-20 hours
Individual
USD 1,499–3,999 From USD 1,125
Wider surface, more platforms, and deeper verification. Advanced automation.
Estimated effort 20-40 hours
Custom / Enterprise
On-demand scope Per request
Ongoing support, automation, deploying, and non-standard matters.
Scope Effort defined after scope review
Final quote follows a short scope review, backed by proper documentation.
Platform Coverage
Contact
Tell me what is changing in the product.
A brief note is enough to start the conversation.